贴心姐妹网
 · 设为主页 | · 添加收藏 | · 会员注册 | · 会员登录    +
 
首页 | 社会政治 | 职场创业 | 情感关系 | 子女成长 | 多元生活 | 文化艺术 | 社区公益

New Brunswick ban on land acknowledgements is a death blow to nation-to-nation relationships

来源:The Conversation   更新:2021-11-06 22:11:36   作者:Robert Tay-Burroughs

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Brunswick is embroiled in yet another fight with local First Nations whose territories New Brunswick was constituted on — and it’s not surprising.

 

The province’s legislated practice of stealing Indigenous land predates Confederation. Its colonial identity is largely built on the same principles of exclusion, exploitation, domination and dispossession practised by the New Brunswick government today.

 

In some respect, this makes land acknowledgements even more important, because they speak to the core of the provincial-Indigenous relationship: land.

 

In the Maritime provinces and the Gaspé, land is governed (in the most generous definition of that word) by the series of 18th-century Peace and Friendship Treaties signed between the British Crown and the Wabanaki Confederacy nations. These treaties did not cede territory or title to the Crown.

 

This is a fact that has been stated by the Government of Canada and the New Brunswick Court of Appeal — a necessary and important truth that precedes any reconciliation. A government that refuses to acknowledge this should not have the legitimacy to govern.

 

Land acknowledgements and what’s happening in N.B.

 

In their most expansive interpretation, land acknowledgements are small reminders for settlers that treaties are living documents and we have, as treaty people and partners, responsibilities to breathe life into those documents and renew those commitments.

 

Land acknowledgements could be action-oriented calls to service, but the reality is that they are often little more than symbolic gestures.

 

Surprisingly (and seemingly out of nowhere), on Oct. 14, New Brunswick’s Attorney General Ted Flemming forbade the use of land acknowledgements that recognized the unceded and unsurrendered territories of the Wolastoqiyik and Mi’gmaq by government employees across the entire public service.

 

The government argues it has “no choice” but to defend itself after the Wolastoqey Nation filed its legal claim asserting Indigenous title over 60 per cent of the provincial territorial landmass. Logically, this defence included the ban of symbolic gestures.

 

Leading by “example,” Flemming stated that he has not made such a land acknowledgement since October 2020. Aboriginal Affairs Minister Arlene Dunn has been silent on the matter, avoiding media requests and deferring to Flemming on the question.

 

Crown-Indigenous relations in N.B.

 

It has been a challenging 18 months or so for the provincial-Indigenous relationship in New Brunswick. Since assuming office in September 2020, Dunn has managed to deem herself unwelcome in Indigenous communities across the province. She has called for understanding, stating that “they will see that my actions are going to speak louder than words.”

 

Her actions include publicly undermining calls for the government to conduct a public inquiry into systemic racism against Indigenous Peoples, which prompted chiefs to demand her resignation. She then proposed the All Nations/All Parties Working Group on Truth and Reconciliation, which collapsed after Indigenous leadership withdrew their support of her and her proposed work.

 

More recently, Dunn appeared before the Senate of Canada to articulate her government’s rejection of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’ principles on free, prior and informed consent.

 

Unsurprisingly, the provincial-Indigenous relationship in New Brunswick is barely alive. In June, that was further solidified when Madawaska chief Patricia Bernard removed the Canadian and New Brunswick flags from her community saying:

 

“Currently we don’t really have any kind of relationship with the federal government except their constitutional responsibility to us, and no relationship with the provincial government.”

 

The nation-to-nation relationship must be dead in N.B.

 

The land acknowledgements ban is a death blow to the concept of nation-to-nation in New Brunswick.

 

It represents an insidious reality: that the attorney general, premier and aboriginal affairs minister have convinced a seemingly unwilling cabinet to reject the basic foundational principle of the Peace and Friendship Treaties — that these lands are unceded and unsurrendered.

 

By rejecting this principle, New Brunswick also rejects the sovereignty of the Wolastoqiyik and Mi’gmaq, thus maintaining a decade-old acceptance of the doctrine of discovery as government policy.

 

The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples affirmed that acknowledging Indigenous sovereignty is a precondition for reconciliation — I have written about this too.

 

If senior ministers of the Crown in New Brunswick responsible for Indigenous relations cannot accept or acknowledge Indigenous sovereignty, then surely nation-to-nation must be dead.

 

Unceded and unsurrendered

 

The fact that land acknowledgements unsettle the New Brunswick government to the point that the justice ministry is cracking down on their use doesn’t speak highly of the province’s legal case against the Wolastoqey Nation. Clearly, New Brunswick is reluctant to relinquish its claim to absolute and exclusive sovereignty over this territory.

 

Yet theirs is exactly that: a claim. That the strength of the claim rests on civil servants avoiding the use of the words “unceded” and “unsurrendered” indicates that even the province recognizes its ludicrousness.

 

Litigation is a very tangible consequence of the 200 years of land theft sanctioned by the New Brunswick legislature. We don’t need a land acknowledgement to confirm this when we have laws that spell it out.

 

Land acknowledge, don’t land acknowledge

 

This farce reveals a sad state of affairs in New Brunswick: this government doesn’t know what it is reconciling and instead of having the humility to learn, it has opted to kill nation-to-nation.

 

The series of half measured, watered-down legislative motions and childishness of the past 18 months stresses that we are being led by unserious, unqualified people when it comes to realizing reconciliation.

 

The Department of Aboriginal Affairs, which not only toes the party line on terra nullius but sets it, is led by a minister who claims to her colleagues that she is working on a plan to better the relationship with First Nations. This is a plan she conceived without the knowledge of First Nations to improve a relationship that she has, at every opportunity, demonstrated she doesn’t understand.

 

Land acknowledge, don’t land acknowledge. But a new approach to the relationship, rooted in justice, equity and good faith, grounded by the shared acknowledgement of the principles of the Peace and Friendship Treaties and perhaps even led by new faces is required.


Robert Tay-Burroughs, PhD Student, Interdisciplinary Studies, University of New Brunswick

 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

分享到: 更多
相关文章
[多元生活] Urban gardens are crucial food sources for pollinators - here’s wh
[社会政治] New study reveals intensified housing inequality in Canada from 19
[社会政治] From the Amazon, Indigenous Peoples offer new compass to navigate
[社会政治] Afghanistan: progress on women’s rights has been hard fought – now
[社会政治] The world must not look away as the Taliban sexually enslaves wome
[社会政治] Suburban monumentalism: How do we change Indigenous-settler relati
[社会政治] Canada’s new governor general, Mary Simon, is poised to engage in
[社会政治] Reconciliation and Residential Schools: Canadians need new stories
[社会政治] Bans on critical race theory could have a chilling effect on how e
[社会政治] Coronavirus variants have new names: we can finally stop stigmatis
发表评论
您必须登录后才能发表评论![立即登录] 还没有注册会员?[立即注册]  
 
会员登录
用户名:
密 码:
 
· 关于我们 About Us · 用户条约 Terms and Conditions · 隐私政策 Privacy Policy · 联系方式 Contact Us
版权声明:本网发布的内容版权归Lovingsister Media Inc. 所有,未经书面许可,严禁转载,违者将承担法律责任。
© 2013 Lovingsister Media Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.