贴心姐妹网
 · 设为主页 | · 添加收藏 | · 会员注册 | · 会员登录    +
 
首页 | 社会政治 | 职场创业 | 情感关系 | 子女成长 | 多元生活 | 文化艺术 | 社区公益

Coronavirus: five ways some states have used the pandemic to curtail human rights and democracy

来源:The Conversation   更新:2020-12-09 12:05:58   作者:Rachel M Gisselquis,Durgesh Solanki

In the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak, at least 95 countries declared a national emergency, empowering governments to act in ways they would not normally to protect citizens.

Such exceptional periods pose major risks for democracy and human rights, providing opportunities for leaders and states to consolidate power. Here are five areas of concern.

1. Lockdowns and their enforcement

Most countries around the world adopted some form of lockdown, ranging from partial or night-time curfew to complete lockdown. Lockdowns may help to flatten the curve and curb the spread of disease, but for many they also impose extreme hardship. One study estimated that, across 30 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, only 6.8% of households could stay at home without major damage to their health and welfare.

In many countries, security forces were used to enforce lockdowns, and reports document several incidents of excessive force and rights violations. In Kenya, for instance, police fired tear gas and beat commuters ahead of imposing curfew. In India, which adopted one of the most stringent lockdowns with complete restriction on any non-essential activities, an estimated 900 people died due to the lockdown and its enforcement.

In South Africa, security forces brutally beat a man after finding him in possession of alcohol, which was restricted under coronavirus measures. The case of Collins Khosa, who died from his injuries, has subsequently become a rallying point for protest against police brutality.

In its ruling, the Pretoria-based High Court ordered the development of a code of conduct for security forces during the lockdown, including the “absolute prohibition on torture”. Nevertheless, police violence in poor neighbourhoods exacerbated by the lockdown has continued, underscoring the gap in many contexts between formal rules and practice.

2. Laws to consolidate power

One case of this that has received a lot of global attention is Hungary, where the Viktor Orban-led government passed a law in March allowing the prime minister to rule by decree for an indefinite time. While this “extraordinary legal order” was formally revoked in June 2020, another bill was passed, allowing similar powers during a state of medical emergency.

Another example is Cambodia, where the prime minister, Hun Sen, pushed for a sweeping State of Emergency Law described by Amnesty International as a “grave threat to human rights”.


Read more: Cambodia: treason trials the latest in the country's slide to autocracy


The law passed in April grants the prime minister vast new powers, including unlimited surveillance of telecommunications, restrictions of freedom of movement and assembly, seizing of private property, and “other measures that are deemed appropriate and necessary in response to the state of emergency”.

3. The curbing of dissent and opposition

Closely related is the use of emergency laws to curb dissent and opposition. Citing emergency-linked restrictions on freedom of assembly, movement and information, states have arrested activists and political opposition leaders, and restricted protests. In many cases these laws existed before the pandemic but were invoked during the pandemic to curb dissent. In Azerbaijan, the president, Ilham Aliyev called for the arrest of opposition leaders and termed them “traitors” in a speech on March 19, as part of the country’s COVID-19 response.

Since the speech, the country has witnessed the arrest of opposition leaders who are apparently what Aliyev had in mind when he mentioned traitors. Similarly, in Zimbabwe, the police arrested nurses and doctors during protests for salary hikes, on the grounds that they were violating lockdown.

4. Restrictions on the media

Some states have used the pretext of curbing the spread of “fake news” and “false information” about the coronavirus to restrict press freedoms, either by passing new laws or enforcing previously passed laws more strictly. Such laws have been used, as in Cambodia, China, and Egypt, to arrest journalists critical of government policies.

In India restrictive press laws have been used to force news organisations to adhere to the “official version” on COVID-related reporting. Reporters without Borders has said that coronavirus emergency laws “spell disaster for press freedom”, offering examples from several dozen countries.

5. The use of new surveillance technology

Government responses to the coronavirus have included the use of apps for contact tracing and other new surveillance technology. Many of these apps collect more data than necessary for contact tracing and allow the possibility for individuals to be identified, with inadequate data protection for users.

In Russia, for instance, legislation was passed in June 2020 on the use of facial recognition technology and a unified federal register, supposedly to help authorities ensure social distancing. In Ghana, special emergency laws give the government access to subscriber data from telecoms companies.

The major concern is that these technologies will outlive the pandemic, and could be used for continued monitoring and control of populations. Alongside rollbacks in rights and weakening of democratic institutions, these new surveillance tools raise strong concerns for the future.The Conversation

Rachel M Gisselquist, Senior Research Fellow, Political Science, United Nations University and Durgesh Solanki, PhD Candidate, Sociology, Johns Hopkins University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

分享到: 更多
相关文章
[社会政治] The pandemic exposed gender inequality: Let’s seize the opportunit
[社会政治] The COVID-19 pandemic has made the impacts of gender-based violenc
[社会政治] In a pandemic, ignoring science affects everyone. Citizenship educ
[社会政治] Canadian election 2021: Voters head to the polls with the pandemic
[社会政治] Coronavirus variants have new names: we can finally stop stigmatis
[社会政治] The nuclear weapons ban treaty is groundbreaking, even if the nucl
[社会政治] I spoke to 99 big thinkers about what our 'world after coronavirus
[社会政治] Cicely was young, Black and enslaved – her death during an epidemi
[社会政治] Donald Trump gets coronavirus: what catching COVID-19 meant for Bo
[社会政治] Will Chrystia Freeland lead a feminist post-coronavirus recovery?
发表评论
您必须登录后才能发表评论![立即登录] 还没有注册会员?[立即注册]  
 
会员登录
用户名:
密 码:
 
· 关于我们 About Us · 用户条约 Terms and Conditions · 隐私政策 Privacy Policy · 联系方式 Contact Us
版权声明:本网发布的内容版权归Lovingsister Media Inc. 所有,未经书面许可,严禁转载,违者将承担法律责任。
© 2013 Lovingsister Media Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.