贴心姐妹网
 · 设为主页 | · 添加收藏 | · 会员注册 | · 会员登录    +
 
首页 | 社会政治 | 职场创业 | 情感关系 | 子女成长 | 多元生活 | 文化艺术 | 社区公益

A public health approach to stemming gun violence

来源:Harvard Gazette   更新:2017-10-10 18:20:26   作者:Amy Roeder

In the wake of a mass shooting on October 1 in Las Vegas that left at least 59 people dead and more than 500 injured, David Hemenway, professor of health policy at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center, offered insights on the public health approach to gun control.

Are mass shootings becoming more frequent and more deadly in the U.S.?

Public mass shootings, such as what just happened in Las Vegas and in last year’s shooting at the Pulse nightclub in Florida have become more frequent. Unfortunately, it appears that these killings are somewhat contagious.

They also seem to be becoming more deadly—largely because of the weaponry at the killers’ disposal. The Las Vegas shooter had 47 guns in his hotel room—all purchased legally—including at least one that could fire at 9 rounds per second.

But while these mass shootings are horrific, from a public health perspective, the daily toll of gun homicides, accidents, and suicides is more of a concern.

How can gun violence be tackled from a public health perspective?

A lesson from public health is that it is usually more effective to change the environment than to try to change people. The U.S. should use the same harm reduction approach to gun violence that it uses to treat other public health threats, like automobile crashes or air pollution—employing a wide variety of methods to reduce the problem.

It is very easy in this country for people to get guns, even the deadliest weapons. The Harvard Injury Control Research Center found that 22% of gun owners obtained their most recent gun without a background check. And, unfortunately, background checks in the United States seem to be the weakest of any high-income country.

In Australia, after the massacre of 35 people in Port Arthur 21 years ago, Australians said, “Enough is enough.” What made a difference was that a conservative prime minister led the effort. They banned the weapons most commonly used in their mass shootings—semiautomatic and pump-action rifles—and bought back those that people already owned. And they tightened their gun laws. While they had 13 gun massacres in the two decades before the Port Author massacre, in the two decades since, they have had none. Australia has also seen dramatic drops in both firearm homicide and firearm suicide.

Our policies are used in the rest of the world as a counter-argument—an example of what not to do. If someone in Australia, for example, wants to loosen up gun control laws, opponents say, “Do you want to end up like the U.S.?” And nobody does.

You’ve spoken out against the ban on using federal funds for research into gun violence. How might more research help improve safety?

Research matters. In a country like Japan, that has very few guns and almost no gun deaths, it would not be that important. But we live in a country with lots of guns and lots of gun deaths. We should expect our guns to be with us for a very long time. We have to learn how to live with them—right now too many of us are dying from them.

There are so many things that we need to know and need to do. A couple of examples? We need to find ways to stop gun thefts—currently some 300,000 or more guns are stolen each year, a prime way they get into the criminal marketplace. We need to improve gun storage to help stop guns from getting into the wrong hands. Gun theft could also be reduced by constructing guns that won’t operate if stolen. We need to work with trainers to ensure that gun training programs are effective—not only in reducing accidents but also in leading to reductions in gun theft and gun suicide.

The extreme polarization of the gun control debate in the U.S. makes change difficult, but it doesn’t have to stay this way. In public health, there have been major struggles for every success. And there have been a lot of public health successes. You just never know what the tipping point is going to be.

Amy Roeder

(The original link: the link)

分享到: 更多
相关文章
[社会政治] 观点:“我们需要枪支控制的权利。立刻。” (We need gun control RIGHT
[社会政治] On DACA, questions top answers
[社会政治] Campaign ’16: How coverage rerouted
[社会政治] The focal point: white supremacy
[社会政治] The worry over North Korea
[社区公益] “荒野生活的原声之旅”音乐会为残障儿童和青年筹款(带视频)
[社会政治] No cookie-cutter fixes on air pollution
[社会政治] Ensler puts her life on stage
[文化娱乐] 《无印梁品》人物:原住民歌手阿戈鲁卡克获“总督表演奖”
[文化娱乐] 多伦多国际电影节红地毯掠影(4)
发表评论
您必须登录后才能发表评论![立即登录] 还没有注册会员?[立即注册]  
 
会员登录
用户名:
密 码:
 
· 关于我们 About Us · 用户条约 Terms and Conditions · 隐私政策 Privacy Policy · 联系方式 Contact Us
版权声明:本网发布的内容版权归Lovingsister Media Inc. 所有,未经书面许可,严禁转载,违者将承担法律责任。
© 2013 Lovingsister Media Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.