贴心姐妹网
 · 设为主页 | · 添加收藏 | · 会员注册 | · 会员登录    +
 
首页 | 社会政治 | 职场创业 | 情感关系 | 子女成长 | 多元生活 | 文化艺术 | 社区公益

万锦市将建安全毒品注射屋?“子虚乌有”还是“反映民意”?(一)万锦市市长薛家平的声明:“这绝非真的”

来源:贴心姐妹网   更新:2016-10-25 09:35:12   作者:贴心姐妹网
万锦市将建安全毒品注射屋?“子虚乌有”还是“反映民意”?(一)万锦市市长薛家平的声明:“这绝非真的”

图/万锦市政府    万锦市长薛家平和部分区域议员、市议员在新闻发布会上

万锦市市长薛家平今天在新闻发布会上的声明:

Remarks by Mayor Frank Scarpitti

Press Conference to Clarify Misinformation and Rumours About Safe Injections Sites in Markham
October 25, 2016

Markham Civic Centre
 
Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us for this important media briefing on such short notice.
I called this press conference today, and asked the York Region Associate Medical Officer of Health - Dr. Richard Gould to join me, to address an important issue that just came to our attention.
And that is the misinformation and inaccurate reporting of a safe injection site being considered for Markham.
This was discussed at our Development Services meeting with Council members yesterday morning, and the level of concern about the misinformation circulating in our community, especially the Chinese community prompted me to call this press conference today.
In late September the federal member for Markham-Unionville (Bob Saroya) sent a letter that was subsequently picked up by one of our local Chinese media.
That letter, and the reporting by the media, has left many readers and residents of Markham thinking that a safe (drug) injection site might be located in Markham.
This is simply not true - and we wish to address this misinformation today and ensure everyone has the facts.
Federal law governing safe-injection sites, which was passed by the previous Conservative government, requires facilities to apply for exemptions from Health Canada under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
In fact the identification and location of Safe Injection sites is based on need, and has to be supported by a wide range of documentation - including letters of opinion by a number of entities including the Ministers of Public Health and Safety, the Chief Medical Officer, local government, the Chief of Police, and professional colleges.
Let me assure there that there are no such letters of opinion in place related to Markham.
In fact, our own York Region Chief Medical Officer has no knowledge that there is a need in Markham for this, nor has he been consulted about a letter of opinion to state as much.
So I have to question why a local member of parliament would go on record to suggest that Markham was somehow being considered for such a facility.
Even if there were letters of opinion providing advice about the need for a safe injection site in Markham - there is a strict requirement for extensive public consultation beforehand.
Unfortunately the letter from the local MP for Markham-Unionville has served to perpetuate a perception and fear mongering that is completely at odds with the reality of need and circumstances in Markham.
And, it ignores and misrepresents the process undertaken at a federal level -- a process the local federal member should be familiar with.
Municipalities do not have the legal ability to prevent such sites, but if a site was recommended for Markham it would be required to comply with provincial and federal regulations, and would certainly not be located near any sensitive public institutions such as schools.
There are only a limited number of safe injection sites considered for Canada based on need, and in the opinion of York Region Medical Health – there is no need in Markham.
As I mentioned, the legal operation of a Safe Injection Site in Canada requires an exemption under section 56.1 (2) of the Controlled Drugs & Substances Act (CDSA), which is granted by the federal Minister of Health. The exemption application includes an extensive list of documentation and letters of opinion from various stakeholders, including the municipal government.
Unfortunately, the letter written by the local member was reported in the local Chinese media, and it has since caused a great deal of concern in that community.
It was for that reason we extended a special invitation to the Chinese media today.
So before I introduce Dr. Gould let me emphasize and repeat:
• There is no identified need for this in Markham
• There is an extensive process to establish that need.
• Markham would be requested to confirm that need and we have not been advised to do so as part of that process.
• The process is administered by the Federal government.
• And there would be extensive public consultation ahead of time.
Markham Council has invited Mr. Saroya to attend a Markham Council meeting to discuss his understanding of the legislation, and to provide any information he has on any proposed sites in Markham.
In the meantime, I hope all the media here today will ensure that the real facts of this situation are reported for the benefit of our residents.
Thank you.
分享到: 更多
相关文章
[社会政治] 不再视而不见: 语言及精神虐待
[社会政治] 万锦市市长薛家平欢迎联邦政府的三年移民计划
[社会政治] 人口普查:万锦市近80%人口为有色少数族裔 成为“大多伦多地区人口最多
[社会政治] 抗议声中,万锦游戏开发公司撤“肮脏的中餐馆”视频游戏并向华人社区道歉
[社会政治] “‘肮脏的华人餐馆’视频游戏是冒犯性的和种族歧视”——万锦市市长薛家平的
[社会政治] “安省不接受种族主义的存在”——安省政府发表声明谴责万锦市一家公司开发
[多元生活] 万锦市政府发出酷暑警报
[多元生活] 万锦博物馆周末举行苹果节
[子女成长] 万锦儿童节8月26日举行
[社会政治] 万锦市今晚举行“庆祝孩童团结”活动 回应市内三家小学出现种族仇恨涂鸦
发表评论
您必须登录后才能发表评论![立即登录] 还没有注册会员?[立即注册]  
 
会员登录
用户名:
密 码:
 
· 关于我们 About Us · 用户条约 Terms and Conditions · 隐私政策 Privacy Policy · 联系方式 Contact Us
版权声明:本网发布的内容版权归Lovingsister Media Inc. 所有,未经书面许可,严禁转载,违者将承担法律责任。
© 2013 Lovingsister Media Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.